I was interested by a post I saw when I did something… added a comment perhaps?
So I looked at it, and I asked Questions.
Apparently, this is not a good thing to be doing.
The post in question was: Give me BLOOD N' Fire and I will REBUILD the World in HIS Image
I also looked at "Overcoming Thought Control and Treading on ALL the Control Data"
As I posted responses, he would answer, and in less than 5 minutes, delete at least my question, and often his response.
He doesn't address my questions on his blog, and so I'm inviting him to address them on mine, where I'll see them, but his loyal fans don't have to. The more I talk to him, the more I wonder about the nature of a man who dodges questions so much.
Responses to "Blood'n'Fire"
well… fortunately, I get to decide what I post. so I'm going to keep posting the comment history in my posts. That's -my- choice.
Interesting how you went from "young man" in your previous post to "young woman".
All I'm asking is that you actually answer my questions. and I haven't had that happen yet.
I make no claims that you shouldn't do what you choose to do, I'm simply asking for some clarification as to why you're doing them.
If your cause is just, why are you squelching my comments? I would like to know what you expect me to see by that command. I'm already a Christian (I'm expecting that's what you mean by "You will See")
It is very interesting that you keep deleting my comments. Why are you afraid of some analytical questions appearing next to your work?
My previous comment and his response:
not what I asked for.
I want to know what Blood'n'Fire actually do. What they actually believe.
If you're not involved, why are you endorsing them, especially if you can't actually tell me what they are specifically. (And by posting about them on this blog, you -are- endorsing them.) What is your connection with this group?
I would like to point out that although you have put a lot of references in your response (so many that I feel overwhelmed just looking at the list). Your headings don't actually equate to an answer to the questions I posed.
In particular, I asked about Values (I'm willing to accept what is already in this post, although I feel they are very broad), Focus, History, and "What we do". I'm guessing you've just given me a list of "What we do" although you say they're friends of the movement, rather than members or initiatives.
You switch from "Friends of Blood'n'Fire who share our heart…" to "I am not involved directly" Why is that?
To Close, why exactly did you add the section from Hebrews and the scripture from Micah after I made my post?
I only keep things that really interest me.
If you didn't interest me , young woman, I would simply let you go and your comments with you.
YOu will definitely breathe, BUT it will be the Breath of the Life of the World.
YOU have already inhaled. SO EXHALE! into that John 3:8 wind.
If your comments interest me, I will keep them if they don't then I am going to let them go.
Your rogation and interrogation is interesting and I will answer you BUT I DECIDE which comments I keep.
And my responses to Mind Control:
Now, I'm a Christian, Baptised at 12, Church Elder @ 21, so your last statement is fairly useless.
The Mind of Christ is surely the Mind of God, and something that humanity is not equipped to deal with.
Absolutely, take every thought captive. that's what I'm trying to do here, is take your thoughts as presented here, and process them. I'm doing that, but without any of the evidence you obviously have available to you, I can't very well determine the validity of your statements as they apply to my life.
what thought control and programming phenomena are you talking about?
I'm actually not arguing that free will is an illusion.
What I'm saying is that according to your statement, is there a situation in which Free Will truly exists?
Free Will and God knowing what I'm going to do before I do it are always coming together at the same time. (I think I translated that right) No Problem. I can deal with such an apparent paradox with no major difficulty. (How does Omniscience have Grace, on a tangent)
Have I created a false dichotomy here?
If you have just said "every fallen human agency has a fallen spiritual agency motivating and directing their actions" Then anything less than the carrying out of God's Will is indirectly, but ultimately attributable to the fallen spiritual agency doing the directing. Much in the same way that the carrying out of God's Will is indirectly but ultimately attributable to God. Are we attributing spiritual-realm powers and motivations to things which are simply an artefact of human free will?
I'm trying to break free of the contraints of my worldview, Help me out with that by answering the questions, perhaps by understanding what you mean, I can better understand the world.
In the meantime, you talk about the Control Data… what is that?
Sorry they're not more complete, but it took a couple of postings before I realised what he was doing.